Test browser:
Version of Chrome: 52.0.2743.116
It is a simple javascript that is to open an image file from local like 'C:\002.jpg'
function run(){
var URL = "file:///C:\002.jpg";
window.open(URL, null);
}
run();
Here is my sample code.
https://fiddle.jshell.net/q326vLya/3/
Please give me any suitable suggestions.
We use Chrome a lot in the classroom and it is a must to working with local files.
What we have been using is "Web Server for Chrome". You start it up, choose the folder wishing to work with and go to URL (like 127.0.0.1:port you chose)
It is a simple server and cannot use PHP but for simple work, might be your solution:
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/web-server-for-chrome/ofhbbkphhbklhfoeikjpcbhemlocgigb
1)
Open your terminal and type
npm install -g http-server
2)
Go to the root folder that you want to serve you files and type:
http-server ./
3)
Read the output of the terminal, something kinda http://localhost:8080 will appear.
Everything on there will be allowed to be got.
Example:
background: url('http://localhost:8080/waw.png');
Okay folks, I completely understand the security reasons behind this error message, but sometimes, we do need a workaround... and here's mine. It uses ASP.Net (rather than JavaScript, which this question was based on) but it'll hopefully be useful to someone.
Our in-house app has a webpage where users can create a list of shortcuts to useful files spread throughout our network. When they click on one of these shortcuts, we want to open these files... but of course, Chrome's error prevents this.
This webpage uses AngularJS 1.x to list the various shortcuts.
Originally, my webpage was attempting to directly create an <a href..> element pointing at the files, but this produced the "Not allowed to load local resource" error when a user clicked on one of these links.
<div ng-repeat='sc in listOfShortcuts' id="{{sc.ShtCut_ID}}" class="cssOneShortcutRecord" >
<div class="cssShortcutIcon">
<img ng-src="{{ GetIconName(sc.ShtCut_PathFilename); }}">
</div>
<div class="cssShortcutName">
<a ng-href="{{ sc.ShtCut_PathFilename }}" ng-attr-title="{{sc.ShtCut_Tooltip}}" target="_blank" >{{ sc.ShtCut_Name }}</a>
</div>
</div>
The solution was to replace those <a href..> elements with this code, to call a function in my Angular controller...
<div ng-click="OpenAnExternalFile(sc.ShtCut_PathFilename);" >
{{ sc.ShtCut_Name }}
</div>
The function itself is very simple...
$scope.OpenAnExternalFile = function (filename) {
//
// Open an external file (i.e. a file which ISN'T in our IIS folder)
// To do this, we get an ASP.Net Handler to manually load the file,
// then return it's contents in a Response.
//
var URL = '/Handlers/DownloadExternalFile.ashx?filename=' + encodeURIComponent(filename);
window.open(URL);
}
And in my ASP.Net project, I added a Handler file called DownloadExternalFile.aspx which contained this code:
namespace MikesProject.Handlers
{
/// <summary>
/// Summary description for DownloadExternalFile
/// </summary>
public class DownloadExternalFile : IHttpHandler
{
// We can't directly open a network file using Javascript, eg
// window.open("\\SomeNetworkPath\ExcelFile\MikesExcelFile.xls");
//
// Instead, we need to get Javascript to call this groovy helper class which loads such a file, then sends it to the stream.
// window.open("/Handlers/DownloadExternalFile.ashx?filename=//SomeNetworkPath/ExcelFile/MikesExcelFile.xls");
//
public void ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)
{
string pathAndFilename = context.Request["filename"]; // eg "\\SomeNetworkPath\ExcelFile\MikesExcelFile.xls"
string filename = System.IO.Path.GetFileName(pathAndFilename); // eg "MikesExcelFile.xls"
context.Response.ClearContent();
WebClient webClient = new WebClient();
using (Stream stream = webClient.OpenRead(pathAndFilename))
{
// Process image...
byte[] data1 = new byte[stream.Length];
stream.Read(data1, 0, data1.Length);
context.Response.AddHeader("Content-Disposition", string.Format("attachment; filename={0}", filename));
context.Response.BinaryWrite(data1);
context.Response.Flush();
context.Response.SuppressContent = true;
context.ApplicationInstance.CompleteRequest();
}
}
public bool IsReusable
{
get
{
return false;
}
}
}
And that's it.
Now, when a user clicks on one of my Shortcut links, it calls the OpenAnExternalFile function, which opens this .ashx file, passing it the path+filename of the file we want to open.
This Handler code loads the file, then passes it's contents back in the HTTP response.
And, job done, the webpage opens the external file.
Phew ! Again - there is a reason why Chrome throws this "Not allowed to load local resources" exception, so tread carefully with this... but I'm posting this code just to demonstrate that this is a fairly simple way around this limitation.
Just one last comment: the original question wanted to open the file "C:\002.jpg". You can't do this. Your website will sit on one server (with it's own C: drive) and has no direct access to your user's own C: drive. So the best you can do is use code like mine to access files somewhere on a network drive.
Chrome specifically blocks local file access this way for security reasons.
Here's an article to workaround the flag in Chrome (and open your system up to vulnerabilities):
http://www.chrome-allow-file-access-from-file.com/
There is a workaround using Web Server for Chrome. Here are the steps:
Add the Extension to chrome.
Choose the folder (C:\images) and launch the server
on your desired port.
Now easily access your local file:
function run(){
// 8887 is the port number you have launched your serve
var URL = "http://127.0.0.1:8887/002.jpg";
window.open(URL, null);
}
run();
PS: You might need to select the CORS Header option from advanced setting incase you face any cross origin access error.
This issue come when I am using PHP as server side language and the work around was to generate base64 enconding of my image before sending the result to client
$path = 'E:/pat/rwanda.png';
$type = pathinfo($path, PATHINFO_EXTENSION);
$data = file_get_contents($path);
$base64 = 'data:image/' . $type . ';base64,' . base64_encode($data);
I think may give someone idea to create his own work around
Thanks
Google Chrome does not allow to load local resources because of the security. Chrome need http url. Internet Explorer and Edge allows to load local resources, but Safari, Chrome, and Firefox doesn't allows to load local resources.
Go to file location and start the Python Server from there.
python -m SimpleHttpServer
then put that url into function:
function run(){
var URL = "http://172.271.1.20:8000/" /* http://0.0.0.0:8000/ or http://127.0.0.1:8000/; */
window.open(URL, null);
}
If you have php installed - you can use built-in server. Just open target dir with files and run
php -S localhost:8001
If you could do this, it will represent a big security problem, as you can access your filesystem, and potentially act on the data available there... Luckily it's not possible to do what you're trying to do.
If you need local resources to be accessed, you can try to start a web server on your machine, and in this case your method will work. Other workarounds are possible, such as acting on Chrome settings, but I always prefer the clean way, installing a local web server, maybe on a different port (no, it's not so difficult!).
See also:
Open local files(file://) using Chrome
Opening local files from chrome
You just need to replace all image network paths to byte strings in stored Encoded HTML string.
For this you required HtmlAgilityPack to convert Html string to Html document.
https://www.nuget.org/packages/HtmlAgilityPack
Find Below code to convert each image src network path(or local path) to byte sting.
It will definitely display all images with network path(or local path) in IE,chrome and firefox.
string encodedHtmlString = Emailmodel.DtEmailFields.Rows[0]["Body"].ToString();
// Decode the encoded string.
StringWriter myWriter = new StringWriter();
HttpUtility.HtmlDecode(encodedHtmlString, myWriter);
string DecodedHtmlString = myWriter.ToString();
//find and replace each img src with byte string
HtmlDocument document = new HtmlDocument();
document.LoadHtml(DecodedHtmlString);
document.DocumentNode.Descendants("img")
.Where(e =>
{
string src = e.GetAttributeValue("src", null) ?? "";
return !string.IsNullOrEmpty(src);//&& src.StartsWith("data:image");
})
.ToList()
.ForEach(x =>
{
string currentSrcValue = x.GetAttributeValue("src", null);
string filePath = Path.GetDirectoryName(currentSrcValue) + "\\";
string filename = Path.GetFileName(currentSrcValue);
string contenttype = "image/" + Path.GetExtension(filename).Replace(".", "");
FileStream fs = new FileStream(filePath + filename, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read);
BinaryReader br = new BinaryReader(fs);
Byte[] bytes = br.ReadBytes((Int32)fs.Length);
br.Close();
fs.Close();
x.SetAttributeValue("src", "data:" + contenttype + ";base64," + Convert.ToBase64String(bytes));
});
string result = document.DocumentNode.OuterHtml;
//Encode HTML string
string myEncodedString = HttpUtility.HtmlEncode(result);
Emailmodel.DtEmailFields.Rows[0]["Body"] = myEncodedString;
Chrome and other Browser restrict the access of a server to local files due to security reasons. However you can open the browser in allowed access mode. Just open the terminal and go to the folder where chrome.exe is stored and write the following command.
chrome.exe --allow-file-access-from-files
Read this for more details
This way, However, didn't work for me so I made a different route for every file in a particular directory. Therefore, going to that path meant opening that file.
function getroutes(list){
list.forEach(function(element) {
app.get("/"+ element, function(req, res) {
res.sendFile(__dirname + "/public/extracted/" + element);
});
});
}
I called this function passing the list of filename in the directory __dirname/public/extracted and it created a different route for each filename which I was able to render on server side.
This is for google-chrome-extension
const url = "file:///C:\002.jpg"
chrome.tabs.create({url, active:true})
manifest.json
{
"name": "",
"manifest_version": 3,
"permissions": [
"activeTab",
"tabs"
],
// ...
}
This solution worked for me in PHP. It opens the PDF in the browser.
// $path is the path to the pdf file
public function showPDF($path) {
if($path) {
header("Content-type: application/pdf");
header("Content-Disposition: inline; filename=filename.pdf");
#readfile($path);
}
}
I've encounterd this problem, and here is my solution for Angular, I wrapped my Angular's asset folder in encodeURIComponent() function. It worked. But still, I'd like to know more about the risk of this solution if there's any:
```const URL = ${encodeURIComponent(/assets/office/file_2.pdf)}
window.open(URL)
I used Angular 9, so this is my url when I clicked open local file:
```http://localhost:4200/%2Fassets%2Foffice%2Ffile_2.pdf```
In the case of audio files, when you give <audio src="C://somePath"/>, this throws an error saying cannot load local resource.
This makes sense because any webpage can't simply give a local path and access your private files.
In case you are trying to play audio with dynamic paths, by changing src property through JS, then here is a sample implementation using Flask server and HTML.
server.py
#app.route("/")
def home():
return render_template('audioMap.html')
#app.route('/<audio_file_name>')
def view_method(audio_file_name):
path_to_audio_file = "C:/Audios/yourFolderPath" + audio_file_name
return send_file(
path_to_audio_file,
mimetype="audio/mp3",
as_attachment=True,
attachment_filename="test.mp3")
audioMap.html
{% raw %}
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
AUDIO: <audio src="Std.mp3" controls >
</body>
</html>
{% endraw %}
Explanation:
When you give the audio file name under src property, this creates a get request in the flask as shown
127.0.0.1 - - [04/May/2021 21:33:12] "GET /Std.mp3 HTTP/1.1" 200 -
As you can see that, the flask has sent a Get request for the Std.mp3 file. So to serve this get request, we wrote an endpoint that takes the audio file name, reads it from the local directory, and returns it back. Hence the audio shows up on UI.
Note: This works only if you are rendering your HTML file using the
render_template method via flask or to say, using flask as your web server.
Google Chrome does not allow to load local resources because of the security .
There is a simple solution for this problem .
1.install live-server plugin in vscode
2.open the html file by live-server
Complete and utter javascript newbie here with a problem fetching .pdf files from a web server based on a partial match. I have made a program that outputs data to a webserver, and one of the components is a folder of .pdf files. I want to be able to click on a link that will pull up the corresponding .pdf file based on a value in the data table that's generated (I'm using slickgrid for this). Each of the .pdf files contains the value that's in the data table and serves as good query to the .pdf folder, and I've been successful at getting the .pdfs I want with the following code:
var value = grid.getData().getItem(row)['data'];
var locpath = window.location.pathname.substring(0,window.location.pathname.lastIndexOf('/'));
var plotsFolder = window.location.protocol + "//" + window.location.host + locpath + "/CovPlots/";
var href = plotsFolder + value + ".pdf";
return "<a href='" + href + "'>" + value + "</a>";
The catch here is that sometimes the .pdf file that's generated is a concatenation of two or more (I've seen up to 4 so far) of the 'data' strings, separated by '_' as a delimiter for reasons not worth getting into. So, if the .pdf file is 'somestring.pdf', I can get it without problem. However, if the .pdf file is 'somestring_anotherstring.pdf', I can't figure out how to get that .pdf file if I have either 'somestring' or 'anotherstring' as the value of 'data'.
I've tried a ton of different things to get some kind of lookup that I can use to pull down the correct file based on a partial match. The latest attempt is with the FilenameFilter object in javascript, but without any knowledge of javascript, I'm having a hard time to get it working. I tried to create a new function that I could call as a lookup for the .pdf URL:
function lookup() {
File directory = new File(plotsFolder);
String[] myFiles = directory.list(new FilenameFilter() {
public boolean accept(File directory, String fileName) {
return fileName.match(value);
}
});
}
That only seems to thrown an error. Can anyone point me in the right direction to be able to download the correct .pdf file based on a partial match? I also tried to see if there was a jquery way to do it, but couldn't seem to find something that works. Thanks in advance!
Without support from the server, JavaScript cannot find a file from a partial filename. What you can do, however, is have a little script on the server that does the partial-filename-matching for JavaScript, and then JavaScript can ask the server to do the match, and then when it gets the match back, it can use that filename.
If you don't mind loading a whole index of all the PDFs at once, you could use this little Python script to generate an index in a nice, JavaScript-friendly JSON format:
#!/usr/bin/env python
# Create an index of a bunch of PDF files.
# Usage: python make_index.py directory_with_pdf_files
import os
import sys
import json
def index(directory):
index = {}
for filename in os.listdir(directory):
base, ext = os.path.splitext(filename)
if ext.lower() != '.pdf':
continue
for keyword in base.split('_'):
index[keyword] = filename
with open(os.path.join(directory, 'index.json'), 'w') as f:
f.write(json.dumps(index))
if __name__ == '__main__':
index(sys.argv[1])
Then you can just load index.json with jQuery or what-have-you. When you need to find a particular PDF's filename, you can do something like this (assuming the object loaded from index.json is in the indexOfPDFs variable):
var href = plotsFolder + indexOfPDFs[value];
I have a script at http://localhost/js/foo.js which needs to spawn a Web Worker from the file http://localhost/js/fooWorker.js. I assumed I could just do something like this:
var worker = new Worker('fooWorker.js')
However, this results in a 404 error, as the browser cannot find http://localhost/fooWorker.js. I was under the impression that worker paths were resolved relative to the script spawning the worker, so shouldn't I just be able to specify the name of another .js file in the same directory without having to provide an absolute path? Am I doing something wrong?
From http://www.w3.org/TR/workers/:
When the Worker(scriptURL) constructor is invoked, the user agent must
run the following steps:
Resolve the scriptURL argument relative to the entry script's base
URL, when the method is invoked.
Actually, it should be relative to the embedded document path
For example,
I have
pathDoc\docA.html
js\b.js
js\worker\c.js
then code should be
var worker = new Worker('..\js\worker\c.js')
Note, you can still get the script url within the worker using the self.location and just prepend it to the paths to make them relative from the worker script rather than html base url.
const workerUrl = location + '';
const basePath = workerUrl.replace(/\/[^/]+$/, '/');
self.importScripts(basePath + '/fooWorker.js');
Btw, if you include your worker via blob, you can still pass meta info like it's url via # hash params.
With import.meta.url, you should be able to have it work like relative path.
var worker = new Worker(new URL('./fooWorker.js', import.meta.url));
how can i append data to a file using javascript?
i tried to use this code, but i got an error:
var fso = new ActiveXObject("Scripting.FileSystemOject");
var filepath = fso.GetFile("member.txt");
var fileObject = fso.OpenTextFile(filepath, 8);
file.WriteLine(id + "|" + pass);
fileObject.close();
the error is on var fso = new ActiveXObject("Scripting.FileSystemOject");, written: Error: Automation server can't create object
is there any other way to append the file using javascript or the way to fix this? thanks :)
EDIT:
i have doing what's written on this, and it still not working :/
I just realized these in your code:
var fileObject = fso.OpenTextFile(filepath, 8,true);
You'll need the true-argument, if the file does not exist, or you want to overwrite/append it.
var filepath = fso.GetFile("member.txt");// This won't work.
var filepath = "your_filePath"; // Use this instead
var fileObject = fso.OpenTextFile(filepath, 8, true);
OpenTextFile() needs a path as a string like "D:/test/file.txt". GetFile() returns an object, which you can see as a string (D:\test\file.txt), but it's not a string. Use also absolute paths, relative paths don't seem to work by my experience.
EDIT
Add the code below to the <head>-part of your html-file, then save locally as a hta (with file extension hta, not htm or html).
<hta:application
applicationName="MyApp"
id="myapp"
singleInstance="yes"
/>
Then run the hta-file. If you still getting an ActiveX-error, it's not supported by your OS. If this works, you haven't done all the security settings correct.
EDIT II
In this case it's not very usefull to get the path through ActiveX, you'll need to write it literal anyway. And I'm not supposed to do your homeworks, but this does the trick...
var filepath = new String(fso.GetFile("member.txt")).replace(/\\/g,'/');
And don't forget what I've said above about using absolute paths...
The 8 in the OpenTextFile function specify that you want to append to the file. Your problem comes from the security restriction of your browser. To make it work you'll have to lower the security level, which is not really recommended.
The error is thrown because there are security restrictions which donot allow the activex to run. change your security settings to allow the activex if your using internet explorer (which i think you are).
This might be useful http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/help/genuine/ie-activex
Cheers
EDIT: i have doing what's written on this, and it still not working :/
* try Restarting your browser
As pointed out in this comment
Javascript: how to append data to a file
the cause of the error Error: Automation server can't create object is the typo in the progid passed to ActiveXObject: Oject instead of Object:
var fso = new ActiveXObject("Scripting.FileSystemOject");
there is a missing b!
this is my problem i cant save my results to driver x that is company shared folder and i have permission to write for some reason , but i can save on driver c.
the messege show
Webpage error details
Message: Automation server can't create object Line: 93 Char: 1 Code:
0 URI:
file:///X:/OmrilDocs/Omrix%20Public/All%20Omrix%20Public/Training/index.html
notic : i can use only javascript , no server side language is allowd :(
this is the code i use
alert(answerText);
var fso = new ActiveXObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject");
var s = fso.CreateTextFile("X:\OmrilDocs\Omrix Public\All Omrix Public\Training\text.txt", true);
s.WriteLine(answerText);
s.Close();
im using ie8 on xp 2
You need to replace \ with \\.
It should look like:-
var s = fso.CreateTextFile("X:\\OmrilDocs\\Omrix Public\\All Omrix Public\\Training\\text.txt", true);
While it is running, it gives a popup window which you need to allow to create the file.
Screenshot look like:-
Eventhought you've loaded index.html from server, the code is executed in the work station.
You've written the path literally in your function. However, FSO tries to find the target from the work station only, and it is not capable to follow a path associated to some drive letter. (In other work stations that same path might be associated to a different letter.)
So, you need to to use the real name (or IP) of that server:
fso.CreateTextFile("//YOUR_SERVER_NAME/OmrilDocs...
Also the saving folder have to exist. When using true-argument in CreateTextFile only a new file is created to the provided path, new folders are not. Hence if there is a misstypo in the pathname, function will fail.