Test browser:
Version of Chrome: 52.0.2743.116
It is a simple javascript that is to open an image file from local like 'C:\002.jpg'
function run(){
var URL = "file:///C:\002.jpg";
window.open(URL, null);
}
run();
Here is my sample code.
https://fiddle.jshell.net/q326vLya/3/
Please give me any suitable suggestions.
We use Chrome a lot in the classroom and it is a must to working with local files.
What we have been using is "Web Server for Chrome". You start it up, choose the folder wishing to work with and go to URL (like 127.0.0.1:port you chose)
It is a simple server and cannot use PHP but for simple work, might be your solution:
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/web-server-for-chrome/ofhbbkphhbklhfoeikjpcbhemlocgigb
1)
Open your terminal and type
npm install -g http-server
2)
Go to the root folder that you want to serve you files and type:
http-server ./
3)
Read the output of the terminal, something kinda http://localhost:8080 will appear.
Everything on there will be allowed to be got.
Example:
background: url('http://localhost:8080/waw.png');
Okay folks, I completely understand the security reasons behind this error message, but sometimes, we do need a workaround... and here's mine. It uses ASP.Net (rather than JavaScript, which this question was based on) but it'll hopefully be useful to someone.
Our in-house app has a webpage where users can create a list of shortcuts to useful files spread throughout our network. When they click on one of these shortcuts, we want to open these files... but of course, Chrome's error prevents this.
This webpage uses AngularJS 1.x to list the various shortcuts.
Originally, my webpage was attempting to directly create an <a href..> element pointing at the files, but this produced the "Not allowed to load local resource" error when a user clicked on one of these links.
<div ng-repeat='sc in listOfShortcuts' id="{{sc.ShtCut_ID}}" class="cssOneShortcutRecord" >
<div class="cssShortcutIcon">
<img ng-src="{{ GetIconName(sc.ShtCut_PathFilename); }}">
</div>
<div class="cssShortcutName">
<a ng-href="{{ sc.ShtCut_PathFilename }}" ng-attr-title="{{sc.ShtCut_Tooltip}}" target="_blank" >{{ sc.ShtCut_Name }}</a>
</div>
</div>
The solution was to replace those <a href..> elements with this code, to call a function in my Angular controller...
<div ng-click="OpenAnExternalFile(sc.ShtCut_PathFilename);" >
{{ sc.ShtCut_Name }}
</div>
The function itself is very simple...
$scope.OpenAnExternalFile = function (filename) {
//
// Open an external file (i.e. a file which ISN'T in our IIS folder)
// To do this, we get an ASP.Net Handler to manually load the file,
// then return it's contents in a Response.
//
var URL = '/Handlers/DownloadExternalFile.ashx?filename=' + encodeURIComponent(filename);
window.open(URL);
}
And in my ASP.Net project, I added a Handler file called DownloadExternalFile.aspx which contained this code:
namespace MikesProject.Handlers
{
/// <summary>
/// Summary description for DownloadExternalFile
/// </summary>
public class DownloadExternalFile : IHttpHandler
{
// We can't directly open a network file using Javascript, eg
// window.open("\\SomeNetworkPath\ExcelFile\MikesExcelFile.xls");
//
// Instead, we need to get Javascript to call this groovy helper class which loads such a file, then sends it to the stream.
// window.open("/Handlers/DownloadExternalFile.ashx?filename=//SomeNetworkPath/ExcelFile/MikesExcelFile.xls");
//
public void ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)
{
string pathAndFilename = context.Request["filename"]; // eg "\\SomeNetworkPath\ExcelFile\MikesExcelFile.xls"
string filename = System.IO.Path.GetFileName(pathAndFilename); // eg "MikesExcelFile.xls"
context.Response.ClearContent();
WebClient webClient = new WebClient();
using (Stream stream = webClient.OpenRead(pathAndFilename))
{
// Process image...
byte[] data1 = new byte[stream.Length];
stream.Read(data1, 0, data1.Length);
context.Response.AddHeader("Content-Disposition", string.Format("attachment; filename={0}", filename));
context.Response.BinaryWrite(data1);
context.Response.Flush();
context.Response.SuppressContent = true;
context.ApplicationInstance.CompleteRequest();
}
}
public bool IsReusable
{
get
{
return false;
}
}
}
And that's it.
Now, when a user clicks on one of my Shortcut links, it calls the OpenAnExternalFile function, which opens this .ashx file, passing it the path+filename of the file we want to open.
This Handler code loads the file, then passes it's contents back in the HTTP response.
And, job done, the webpage opens the external file.
Phew ! Again - there is a reason why Chrome throws this "Not allowed to load local resources" exception, so tread carefully with this... but I'm posting this code just to demonstrate that this is a fairly simple way around this limitation.
Just one last comment: the original question wanted to open the file "C:\002.jpg". You can't do this. Your website will sit on one server (with it's own C: drive) and has no direct access to your user's own C: drive. So the best you can do is use code like mine to access files somewhere on a network drive.
Chrome specifically blocks local file access this way for security reasons.
Here's an article to workaround the flag in Chrome (and open your system up to vulnerabilities):
http://www.chrome-allow-file-access-from-file.com/
There is a workaround using Web Server for Chrome. Here are the steps:
Add the Extension to chrome.
Choose the folder (C:\images) and launch the server
on your desired port.
Now easily access your local file:
function run(){
// 8887 is the port number you have launched your serve
var URL = "http://127.0.0.1:8887/002.jpg";
window.open(URL, null);
}
run();
PS: You might need to select the CORS Header option from advanced setting incase you face any cross origin access error.
This issue come when I am using PHP as server side language and the work around was to generate base64 enconding of my image before sending the result to client
$path = 'E:/pat/rwanda.png';
$type = pathinfo($path, PATHINFO_EXTENSION);
$data = file_get_contents($path);
$base64 = 'data:image/' . $type . ';base64,' . base64_encode($data);
I think may give someone idea to create his own work around
Thanks
Google Chrome does not allow to load local resources because of the security. Chrome need http url. Internet Explorer and Edge allows to load local resources, but Safari, Chrome, and Firefox doesn't allows to load local resources.
Go to file location and start the Python Server from there.
python -m SimpleHttpServer
then put that url into function:
function run(){
var URL = "http://172.271.1.20:8000/" /* http://0.0.0.0:8000/ or http://127.0.0.1:8000/; */
window.open(URL, null);
}
If you have php installed - you can use built-in server. Just open target dir with files and run
php -S localhost:8001
If you could do this, it will represent a big security problem, as you can access your filesystem, and potentially act on the data available there... Luckily it's not possible to do what you're trying to do.
If you need local resources to be accessed, you can try to start a web server on your machine, and in this case your method will work. Other workarounds are possible, such as acting on Chrome settings, but I always prefer the clean way, installing a local web server, maybe on a different port (no, it's not so difficult!).
See also:
Open local files(file://) using Chrome
Opening local files from chrome
You just need to replace all image network paths to byte strings in stored Encoded HTML string.
For this you required HtmlAgilityPack to convert Html string to Html document.
https://www.nuget.org/packages/HtmlAgilityPack
Find Below code to convert each image src network path(or local path) to byte sting.
It will definitely display all images with network path(or local path) in IE,chrome and firefox.
string encodedHtmlString = Emailmodel.DtEmailFields.Rows[0]["Body"].ToString();
// Decode the encoded string.
StringWriter myWriter = new StringWriter();
HttpUtility.HtmlDecode(encodedHtmlString, myWriter);
string DecodedHtmlString = myWriter.ToString();
//find and replace each img src with byte string
HtmlDocument document = new HtmlDocument();
document.LoadHtml(DecodedHtmlString);
document.DocumentNode.Descendants("img")
.Where(e =>
{
string src = e.GetAttributeValue("src", null) ?? "";
return !string.IsNullOrEmpty(src);//&& src.StartsWith("data:image");
})
.ToList()
.ForEach(x =>
{
string currentSrcValue = x.GetAttributeValue("src", null);
string filePath = Path.GetDirectoryName(currentSrcValue) + "\\";
string filename = Path.GetFileName(currentSrcValue);
string contenttype = "image/" + Path.GetExtension(filename).Replace(".", "");
FileStream fs = new FileStream(filePath + filename, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read);
BinaryReader br = new BinaryReader(fs);
Byte[] bytes = br.ReadBytes((Int32)fs.Length);
br.Close();
fs.Close();
x.SetAttributeValue("src", "data:" + contenttype + ";base64," + Convert.ToBase64String(bytes));
});
string result = document.DocumentNode.OuterHtml;
//Encode HTML string
string myEncodedString = HttpUtility.HtmlEncode(result);
Emailmodel.DtEmailFields.Rows[0]["Body"] = myEncodedString;
Chrome and other Browser restrict the access of a server to local files due to security reasons. However you can open the browser in allowed access mode. Just open the terminal and go to the folder where chrome.exe is stored and write the following command.
chrome.exe --allow-file-access-from-files
Read this for more details
This way, However, didn't work for me so I made a different route for every file in a particular directory. Therefore, going to that path meant opening that file.
function getroutes(list){
list.forEach(function(element) {
app.get("/"+ element, function(req, res) {
res.sendFile(__dirname + "/public/extracted/" + element);
});
});
}
I called this function passing the list of filename in the directory __dirname/public/extracted and it created a different route for each filename which I was able to render on server side.
This is for google-chrome-extension
const url = "file:///C:\002.jpg"
chrome.tabs.create({url, active:true})
manifest.json
{
"name": "",
"manifest_version": 3,
"permissions": [
"activeTab",
"tabs"
],
// ...
}
This solution worked for me in PHP. It opens the PDF in the browser.
// $path is the path to the pdf file
public function showPDF($path) {
if($path) {
header("Content-type: application/pdf");
header("Content-Disposition: inline; filename=filename.pdf");
#readfile($path);
}
}
I've encounterd this problem, and here is my solution for Angular, I wrapped my Angular's asset folder in encodeURIComponent() function. It worked. But still, I'd like to know more about the risk of this solution if there's any:
```const URL = ${encodeURIComponent(/assets/office/file_2.pdf)}
window.open(URL)
I used Angular 9, so this is my url when I clicked open local file:
```http://localhost:4200/%2Fassets%2Foffice%2Ffile_2.pdf```
In the case of audio files, when you give <audio src="C://somePath"/>, this throws an error saying cannot load local resource.
This makes sense because any webpage can't simply give a local path and access your private files.
In case you are trying to play audio with dynamic paths, by changing src property through JS, then here is a sample implementation using Flask server and HTML.
server.py
#app.route("/")
def home():
return render_template('audioMap.html')
#app.route('/<audio_file_name>')
def view_method(audio_file_name):
path_to_audio_file = "C:/Audios/yourFolderPath" + audio_file_name
return send_file(
path_to_audio_file,
mimetype="audio/mp3",
as_attachment=True,
attachment_filename="test.mp3")
audioMap.html
{% raw %}
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
AUDIO: <audio src="Std.mp3" controls >
</body>
</html>
{% endraw %}
Explanation:
When you give the audio file name under src property, this creates a get request in the flask as shown
127.0.0.1 - - [04/May/2021 21:33:12] "GET /Std.mp3 HTTP/1.1" 200 -
As you can see that, the flask has sent a Get request for the Std.mp3 file. So to serve this get request, we wrote an endpoint that takes the audio file name, reads it from the local directory, and returns it back. Hence the audio shows up on UI.
Note: This works only if you are rendering your HTML file using the
render_template method via flask or to say, using flask as your web server.
Google Chrome does not allow to load local resources because of the security .
There is a simple solution for this problem .
1.install live-server plugin in vscode
2.open the html file by live-server
I'm trying to find the absolute path of my javascript file (not the URL). Instead of hardcoding absolutely paths, I'd prefer using relative paths. For example:
/static/js/index.js
/static/config/1.json
/static/config/2.json
If I can get the absolute path of index.js, then I'm only ../config/ away from accessing either of the two json files.
Searching SO and the internet I either get suggestions for finding the URL, which work but won't solve my problem. Or for file paths, using windows.location.pathname but any permutation of it that I try either returns an empty string, or /.
var currentDirectory = window.location.pathname.split('/').slice(0, -1).join('/');
console.log("Curr dir: " + currentDirectory);
(Returns empty string)
var location = window.location.pathname;
var directoryPath = location.substring(0, location.lastIndexOf("/")+1);
console.log(" dirPath: " + directoryPath);
(Returns a /)
What I'm hoping for is something like:
var absolute_path = window.function.absolute.path()
Which would return say: /u/user/develop/project/server/static/js/index.js
From which I could: (pseudo code again)
var locations = absolute_path.split("js");
# location[0] = "/u/user/develop/project/server/static"
# location[1] = "js/index.js"
var config_file_locations = locations[0] + "config/";
var absolute_path_json1 = config_file_locations + "1.json"
-- EDIT --
Ok, looking at window.location it returns the URL so clearly that's not an answer here.
/static/js/index.js is an absolute path. You can tell because it starts with a /, which takes it back to the root of the web site.
There is no automatic way for a browser to tell anything about how a web server determined how it generated the content for a given URL.
All a browser knows is that it asked the server for /static/js/index.js and the server responded with some JavaScript.
The server might have read a static file, and that file might be in a directory called js and that directory might be a subdirectory of one called static … but then the server might have taken the whole URL, used it in a database query, and pulled the results from a database … or it might have proxied the request to another HTTP server on another computer on another continent.
If you want your client-side JS to know anything about the structure of the filesystem on the HTTP server, then you need to give it that information somehow. It can't get it from the browser.
Hello I have a javascript file, that stores data in the mongodb. I would like to do two things
1) ask for the diskspace due to "db.mycol.stats();" or something like that and store the used storage size (should be "size" or storage size") into a var.
2) I want to store that var in a file - like e.g. .txt
I saw and used the following: (disksapce is an array with different disksizes, I would like to measure, (amount is a var))
var fso2 = new ActiveXObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject");
var b = fso2.CreateTextFile(file_diskspace, true);
for (m=0;m<diskspace.length;m++)
{
b.WriteLine(amount+ ":" + diskspace[m]+"\n");
}
b.Close();
somehow this does not work.
(I'm using a linux server)
There are various reasons why this won't work. You can't typically write files from within a JS context (certainly not from within MongoDB's), ActiveXObject only exists on windows.
If you want to do this write the script by invoking print(db.getSiblingDB("yourDb").stats().storageSize); and writing to a file (or piping the output to a file)
EDIT : Like so : mongo --quiet --eval "db.getSiblingDB('test').stats().storageSize" > size.text
how can i append data to a file using javascript?
i tried to use this code, but i got an error:
var fso = new ActiveXObject("Scripting.FileSystemOject");
var filepath = fso.GetFile("member.txt");
var fileObject = fso.OpenTextFile(filepath, 8);
file.WriteLine(id + "|" + pass);
fileObject.close();
the error is on var fso = new ActiveXObject("Scripting.FileSystemOject");, written: Error: Automation server can't create object
is there any other way to append the file using javascript or the way to fix this? thanks :)
EDIT:
i have doing what's written on this, and it still not working :/
I just realized these in your code:
var fileObject = fso.OpenTextFile(filepath, 8,true);
You'll need the true-argument, if the file does not exist, or you want to overwrite/append it.
var filepath = fso.GetFile("member.txt");// This won't work.
var filepath = "your_filePath"; // Use this instead
var fileObject = fso.OpenTextFile(filepath, 8, true);
OpenTextFile() needs a path as a string like "D:/test/file.txt". GetFile() returns an object, which you can see as a string (D:\test\file.txt), but it's not a string. Use also absolute paths, relative paths don't seem to work by my experience.
EDIT
Add the code below to the <head>-part of your html-file, then save locally as a hta (with file extension hta, not htm or html).
<hta:application
applicationName="MyApp"
id="myapp"
singleInstance="yes"
/>
Then run the hta-file. If you still getting an ActiveX-error, it's not supported by your OS. If this works, you haven't done all the security settings correct.
EDIT II
In this case it's not very usefull to get the path through ActiveX, you'll need to write it literal anyway. And I'm not supposed to do your homeworks, but this does the trick...
var filepath = new String(fso.GetFile("member.txt")).replace(/\\/g,'/');
And don't forget what I've said above about using absolute paths...
The 8 in the OpenTextFile function specify that you want to append to the file. Your problem comes from the security restriction of your browser. To make it work you'll have to lower the security level, which is not really recommended.
The error is thrown because there are security restrictions which donot allow the activex to run. change your security settings to allow the activex if your using internet explorer (which i think you are).
This might be useful http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/help/genuine/ie-activex
Cheers
EDIT: i have doing what's written on this, and it still not working :/
* try Restarting your browser
As pointed out in this comment
Javascript: how to append data to a file
the cause of the error Error: Automation server can't create object is the typo in the progid passed to ActiveXObject: Oject instead of Object:
var fso = new ActiveXObject("Scripting.FileSystemOject");
there is a missing b!
I'm working on a PhoneGap application that captures images using the camera and, later, uploads them. There are two modes of operation for camera in PhoneGap: raw base64 encoded data or a file URI.
The docs themselves say:
Note: The image quality of pictures taken using the camera on newer
devices is quite good. Encoding such images using Base64 has caused
memory issues on some of these devices (iPhone 4, BlackBerry Torch
9800). Therefore, using FILE_URI as the 'Camera.destinationType' is
highly recommended.
So I'm keen to use FILE_URI option. This works great and you can even show the images in IMG tags. The URL looks like this:
file://localhost/var/mobile/Applications/4FE4642B-944C-449BB-9BD6-1E442E47C7CE/tmp/photo_047.jpg
However, at some point later I want to read the contents of the file to upload to a server. I was going to do this using the FileReader type. This doesn't work and I think it's because I can't access the file at the URL above.
The error code I get back from readDataUrl is 1 > FileError.NOT_FOUND_ERR = 1;
Any ideas how I can get to the file? I tried just accessing the last part of the path (photo_047.jpg) based on another sample I saw but no luck.
I'm just getting started with PhoneGap, and given the age of this question you may have found an answer already, but I'll give it a try anyway.
First, would you be able to use the built-in FileTransfer object? It takes a file: URI as an argument.
If FileTransfer won't work for you, and you need to read the file data yourself, you'll need the PhoneGap File objects, like FileReader , as you said. But most of those expect a plain pathname -- not a URI -- to specify the file to work with. The reason you're getting NOT_FOUND_ERR is because it's trying to open a file named file:/localhost/var....
Here's a quick one-liner to extract the path part from your URI:
var path = /file:\/\/.*?(\/.*)/.exec(fileuri)[1];
Hope this helps!
The answer from jgarbers was of help to me but it did not solve the problem. I realized the camera stores photos in Temp folder instead of Document folder. Setting my local file system to temporary allowed it to find the correct location for the camera images.
window.requestFileSystem(LocalFileSystem.TEMPORARY, 0, ...
...
window.requestFileSystem(LocalFileSystem.TEMPORARY, 0, ...
...
var path = /file://.?(/.)/.exec(fileuri)[1];
Ref. above jgarbers and Rik answers (solution has been tested successfully on iOs 7)
you can user the file transfer plugin for uploading any file to the server.
//// pass your file uri to the mediafie param
function uploadFile(mediaFile) {
var ft = new FileTransfer();
path = mediaFile.fullPath;
name = mediaFile.name;
////your service method url
var objUrl = http://example.com;
ft.upload(path,
objUrl,
function (result) {
alert("Success");
},
function (error) {
alert('Error uploading file ' + path + ': ' + error.code);
},
{ fileName: name });
}