I have a div with fixed height and width and inside I have text that is changing. Sometimes it can be a word or two and sometimes it can be a sentence. What I need is to shrink the font size so the text fits to that div.
i had an idea and it worked :) here is my code
$('li').each(function () {
while ($(this).outerHeight() > 25) {
var currentFontSize = $(this).css("font-size");
$(this).css("font-size", (parseFloat(currentFontSize) - 1) + "px");
}
});
I had a similar issue, which made me write my own plugin for this. One solution is to use the shrink-to-fit-approach, as described by user54316.
However if you have to fit multiple items or are concerned with performance, e.g., on window resize, have a look at jquery-quickfit.
It meassures and calculates a size invariant meassure for each letter of the text to fit and uses this to calculate the next best font-size which fits the text into the container.
The calculations are cached, which makes it very fast (there is virtually no performance hit from the 2nd resize on forward) when dealing with multiple texts or having to fit a text multiple times, like e.g., on window resize. I think it would work perfect in your case.
You'd just have to call
$('#yourid').quickfit()
after you changed the text.
Production example, fitting 14x16x2 texts
Try giving the font-size in em:
http://clagnut.com/blog/348/
http://kyleschaeffer.com/best-practices/css-font-size-em-vs-px-vs-pt-vs/
There is a jQuery plugin for that: FitText.js
Here the URL: https://github.com/davatron5000/FitText.js
Here's an example: http://jsfiddle.net/martinschaer/sRvB9/
The function fitText() receives a parameter, with which you need to "play" in order to get the results you want. Also, it resized the text when the window is resized; if you need to have the text resized when (for example) a div is resized, you should add a pair of JS lines for that ;)
$text.css('font-size', "100px");
$text.css('line-height', "100px");
var foo= $div.width() / $text.width();
var bar= $div.height() / $text.height();
if(foo < bar) {
foo=Math.floor(foo*100) +"px";
$text.css('font-size', foo);
$text.css('line-height', foo);
} else {
bar=Math.floor(bar*100) +"px";
$text.css('font-size', bar);
$text.css('line-height', bar);
}
//centralizing text, top and left are defined as 50% on the CSS, optional
$text.css('margin-left', -$text.width() /2 + "px");
$text.css('margin-top', -$text.height() /2 + "px");
One small note is that you need to call this function if the div itself changes size. You can bind this code to the resize eventof the div.
you can do it by defining the font size like......
.small {font-size: 0.8em}
you can see effect here working demo
Related
I am just trying to get the mouse hover div's position at the right according to the space around. Somehow I am able to do this in first two columns but not for other columns. May be my calculations while writing the condition state are wrong.
Can anyone please help?
JS Fiddle URL:
http://jsfiddle.net/mufeedahmad/2u1zr11f/7/
JS Code:
$('.thumb-over-team li').find('.cover').css({opacity:0});
$('.thumb-over-team li').on('mouseenter', function(){
var $this = $(this),
thisoffset = $this.position().left,
openDivId = $(this).find('.cover'),
thumbContainer = '.thumb-over-team',
speedanim = 200;
if(thisoffset + openDivId.outerWidth() >= $(thumbContainer).outerWidth()){
//thisoffset = $(thumbContainer).outerWidth() - openDivId.outerWidth() - 212;
thisoffset = thisoffset - openDivId.outerWidth()+10;
openDivId.stop().css({'z-index':'9999'}).animate({'opacity':'1', 'left':-thisoffset}, 200);
}else{
openDivId.stop().css({'z-index':'9999'}).animate({'opacity':'1', 'left':'212px'}, 200);
}
}).on('mouseleave', function(){
$(this).find('.cover').stop().css({'z-index':'-1'}).animate({'opacity':'0', 'left':'200px'}, 200);
});
$('.close-parent').on('click', function(){
$(this).parents('.cover').stop().css({'z-index':'-1'}).animate({'opacity':'0', 'left':'200px'}, 200);
});;
In your first conditional, try to calculate the position of the offset as:
thisoffset = ($(thumbContainer).outerWidth() - openDivId.outerWidth() - thisoffset);
That way, you're adjusting the appearing square (.cover) when it doesn't fit inside the container, to be as close possible to its rightmost edge: (maximum width - appearing square width - current li position)
Calculated this way, you can animate it with the new offset in positive:
openDivId.stop().css({'z-index':'9999'}).animate({'opacity':'1', 'left':thisoffset}, 200);
See it working here.
For elements that "almost" fit, the current system isn't completely precise because of what I already pointed out in my previous comment: the appearing square, even if it were at 0 opacity, would still be inside the containing element (($(thumbContainer)) or .thumb-over-team) and it would add its width to the total width of the container.
So your conditional may think that there's enough available space in the container to make the expandable element fit, but that would go out of the screen. As an example, notice that there's a horizontal scrollbar from the very beginning, caused by this effect, where your containing .thumb-over-team element doesn't fit in the screen.
But I would say that more precision in this point would require a fresh new approach to your system where the appearing .cover elements were out of the containing ul .thumb-over-team
Fresh take on the problem, essentially based on the main issue: the expandable text block (.cover) used to add its width to the container (.thumb-over-team). This altered the calculations on available container space, and made the text containers go off screen.
The solution is to make sure the expandable .cover elements aren't contained inside the .thumb-over-team element, so they won't impact the calculations on available width.
Here is a JSFiddle containing this new approach: link.
Explanation of how it works:
The idea was to create a separate element called .cover-container and let's put all the expandable .cover elements in there.
We want to associate every image in the li elements in .thumb-over-team with their appropriate .cover (so the first image triggers the first .cover to show, the second image would show the second cover, and so on.) We achieve is by finding out the index of the element that triggered the event:
thisLiIndex = $this.index() + 1
And then selecting the cover in the matching position:
openDivId = $('.cover-container .cover:nth-child(' + thisLiIndex + ')')
The expandable covers shouldn't interfere with the mouseenter or mouseleave events of .thumb-over-team, so we make it to ignore mouse events via CSS:
.cover-container{pointer-events:none;}
Changing from one image to another would automatically trigger new events, so the expanding covers stay visible when the mouse stays on the images, but close automatically when the mouse exits them.
Since the covers are now outside of $(thumbContainer), openDivID.outerWidth() does not alter $(thumbContainer).outerWidth(), and we can use that safely in our positioning.
If I understand the placement that you want, for covers that fit, the position is the current offset (position of the li element that triggered the event) plus the width of the image and some subtle margin
imageWidth + rightSeparation + thisoffset
And for covers that won't fit inside of the screen, we keep them just inside of the screen
thisoffset = $(thumbContainer).outerWidth() - openDivId.outerWidth();
If I have div A and div B, is there a way to say A.width = b.width = MAX(a.width, b.width) ? That is, whichever has the largest inner content would dictate how large both are.
The actual problem I'm trying to solve is with columns - left, middle, and right. I want the left and right to be the same fixed width (but this could vary depending on their content).
It is not possible to use CSS to achieve this. However, if there is a way to do it with a JS-based solution. Here I am using jQuery. Let's say you have two divs, with classes a and b respectively.
$(function() {
function equalizeSize($ele) {
if($ele.length > 1) {
// Let CSS automatically calculate natural width first
$ele.css({ width: 'auto' });
// And then we fetch the newly calculated widths
var maxWidth = Math.max.apply(Math, $ele.map(function(){ return $(this).outerWidth(); }).get());
$ele.css({ width: maxWidth });
}
}
// Run when DOM is ready
equalizeSize($('.a, .b'));
// Run again when viewport has been resized, which **may** affect your div width.
// This is optional, but good to have
// ps: You might want to look into throttling the resize function
$(window).resize(equalizeSize($('.a, .b')));
});
See proof-of-concept fiddle here: http://jsfiddle.net/teddyrised/N4MMg/
The advantages of this simple function:
Allows you to dictate what elements you want to equalize widths with.
Uses the .map() function to construct an array, which we then use Math.max.apply to get the maximum value in the array
Forces automatic calculation of width when the function first fires (especially when resizing the viewport)
Allows you to call to recalculate the size again, using the handler equalizeSize() when you change the content in the divs... you can call the function again, say, after an AJAX call that appends content to either element.
It is not very clear what you want from the description. but I can rewrite your code this way.
var properWidth = Math.max($("#a").width(), $("#b").width());
$("#a").css("width", properWidth + "px");
$("#b").css("width", properWidth + "px");
I am not sure if it is this kind of solution you want.
I'm not sure there is a way to do it like that. But why not make a default function to set the size:
function changeSize(w, h)
{
A.setAttribute('style', 'width:'+w+'; height:'+h);
b.setAttribute('style', 'width:'+w+'; height:'+h);
}
Working fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/kychan/ER2zZ/
I want to change the background color of in-viewport elements (using overflow: scroll)
So here was my first attempt:
http://jsfiddle.net/2YeZG/
As you see, there is a brief flicker of the previous color before the new color is painted. Others have had similar problems.
Following the HTML5 rocks instructions, I tried to introduce requestAnimationFrame to fix this problem to no avail:
http://jsfiddle.net/RETbF/
What am I doing wrong here?
Here is a simpler example showing the same problem: http://jsfiddle.net/HJ9ng/
Filed bug with Chromium here: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=151880
if it is only the background color, well why don't you just change the parent background color to red and once it scroll just change it to pink?
I change your CSS to that
#dad
{
overflow-y: scroll;
overflow-x: hidden;
width: 100px;
height: 600px;
background-color:red;
}
I remove some of you Jquery and change it to this
dad.bind('scroll', function() {
dad.css('background-color', 'pink');
});
And I remove this line
iChild.css('backgroundColor', 'red');
But is the Red color it is important that won't work for sure http://jsfiddle.net/2YeZG/5/
I like Manuel's Solution.
But even though I don't get what you're exactly trying to do, I want to point out a few things.
In your fiddle code, I saw that you included Paul Irish's Shim for requestAnimationFrame.
But you never use it.
(It's basically a reliable setTimeOut, nothing else) it's from frame based animations.)
So since you just want to change some CSS properties, I don't see why you would need it. Even if you want transitions, you should rely on CSS transitions.
Other than that your code could look something like
dad.bind('scroll', function() {
dad.css('background-color', 'pink');
eachElemNameHere.css('background-color','randomColor');
});
Also you should ideally not use something like that if you can help it. You should just add and remove class names and add all these properties in your CSS. Makes it work faster.
Also, again I don't quite get it, but you could use the jQuery function to find out each elements' position from the top to have better control.
Your problem seems to be that you only change the background color of the elements which have already been scrolled into view. Your code expects that the browser waits for your code to handle the scroll event before the browser redraws its view. This is most probably not a guarantee given by the HTML spec. That's why it flickers.
What you should do instead is to change the elements which are going to be scrolled into view. This is related to off screen rendering or double buffering as it is called in computer games programming. You build your scene off screen and copy the finished scene to the visible frame buffer.
I modified your first JSFiddle to include a multiplier for the height of the scroll area: http://jsfiddle.net/2YeZG/13/.
dad.bind('scroll', function() {
// new: query multiplier from input field (for demonstration only) and print message
var multiplier = +($("#multiplier")[0].value);
$("#message")[0].innerHTML=(multiplier*100)-100 + "% of screen rendering";
// your original code
var newScrollY = newScrollY = dad.scrollTop();
var isForward = newScrollY > oldScrollY;
var minVal = bSearch(bots, newScrollY, true);
// new: expand covered height by the given multiplier
// multiplier = 1 is similar to your code
// multiplier = 2 would be complete off screen rendering
var newScrollYHt = newScrollY + multiplier * dadHeight;
// your original code (continued)
var maxVal;
for (maxVal = minVal; maxVal < botsLen; maxVal++) {
var nxtTopSide = tops[maxVal];
if (nxtTopSide >= newScrollYHt) {
break;
}
}
maxVal = Math.min(maxVal, botsLen);
$(dadKids.slice(minVal, maxVal)).css('background', 'pink');
});
Your code had a multiplier of 1, meaning that you update the elements which are currently visible (100% of scroll area height). If you set the multiplier to 2, you get complete off screen updates for all your elements. The browser updates enough elements to the new background color so that even a 100% scroll would show updated elements. Since the browser seldom scrolls 100% of the area in one step (depends of the operating system and the scroll method!), it may be sufficient to reduce the multiplier to e.g. 1.5 (meaning 50% off screen rendering). On my machine (Google Chrome, Mac OS X with touch pad) I cannot produce any flicker if the multiplier is 1.7 or above.
BTW: If you do something more complicated than just changing the background color, you should not do it again and again. Instead you should check whether the element has already been updated and perform the change only afterwards.
See the following fiddle:
[edit: updated fiddle => http://jsfiddle.net/NYZf8/5/ ]
http://jsfiddle.net/NYZf8/1/ (view in different screen sizes, so that ideally the image fits inside the %-width layouted div)
The image should start the animation from the position where it correctly appears after the animation is done.
I don't understand why the first call to setMargin() sets a negative margin even though the logged height for container div and img are the very same ones, that after the jqueryui show() call set the image where I would want it (from the start on). My guess is that somehow the image height is 0/undefined after all, even though it logs fine :?
js:
console.log('img: ' + $('img').height());
console.log('div: ' + $('div').height());
$('img').show('blind', 1500, setMargin);
function setMargin() {
var marginTop =
( $('img').closest('div').height() - $('img').height() ) / 2;
console.log('marginTop: ' + marginTop);
$('img').css('marginTop', marginTop + 'px');
}
setMargin();
Interesting problem...after playing around with your code for a while (latest update), I saw that the blind animation was not actually firing in my browser (I'm testing on Chrome, and maybe it was firing but I wasn't seeing it as the image was never hidden in the first place), so I tried moving it inside the binded load function:
$('img').bind('load', function() {
...
$(this).show('blind', 500);
});
Now that it was animating, it seemed to 'snap' or 'jump' after the animation was complete, and also seemed to appear with an incorrect margin. This smacks of jQuery not being able to correctly calculate the dimensions of something that hadn't been displayed on the screen yet. On top of that, blind seems to need more explicit dimensions to operate correctly. So therein lies the problem: how to calculate elements' rendered dimensions before they've actually appeared on the screen?
One way to do this is to fade in the element whose dimensions you're trying to calculate very slightly - not enough to see yet - do some calculations, then hide it again and prep it for the appearance animation. You can achieve this with jQuery using the fadeTo function:
$('img').bind('load', function() {
$(this).fadeTo(0, 0.01, function() {
// do calculations...
}
}
You would need to work out dimensions, apply them with the css() function, blind the image in and then reset the image styles back to their original states, all thanks to a blind animation that needs these dimensions explicitly. I would also recommend using classes in the css to help you manage things a little better. Here's a detailed working example: jsfiddle working example
Not the most elegant way of doing things, but it's a start. There are a lot more easier ways to achieve seemingly better results, and I guess I just want to know why you're looking to do image blinds and explicit alignment this way? It's just a lot more challenging achieving it with the code you used...anyways, hope this helps! :)
Here's what i have so far:
function loadOff(){
$(document).ready(function(){
$("#eLoader").ajaxStop(function(){
$(this).hide();
$("#eventsContent").show();
var h = document.body.scrollHeight;
$("#bodyBackground").css("height",h+100+"px");
$("#sidePanel1").css("height",h-105+100+"px");
$("#bottom").css("top",h+100+"px");
});
});
}
This is a callback function for a JQuery ajax function, basically what is does is when all ajax is finished .ajaxStop() it hides the loader then shows the content.
The problem i am having is adjusting bodyBackground, sidePanel, and bottom to fit the content. I dont care to have it elastic and retract for short content at this point, i would just like it to extend to proper positioning based on content length.
All divs are absolutely positioned. The numbers in the function are broken down simply to make it easy to explain. -105 is the offsetTop of that element and +100 is the margin between the end of the content and the elements.
if there is a better, more efficient way to achieve this outcome, please, do tell.
Thanks.
Based on your code, the only thing you ought to see is the top 105px of #sidePanel1. Is that your intent? (h = the bottom of the window, according to your code.)
Sticking with the JQuery patterns, you would use
var h = $(window).height();
Maybe you're looking for this instead of the browser window's height? It will get the height of the content element.
$("#eventsContent").outerHeight();